<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learning Kanji &#8211; It&#8217;s Called Literacy, Dumbass!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://henrikfalck.com/blog/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://henrikfalck.com/blog/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy.html</link>
	<description>reinventing web 3.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://henrikfalck.com/blog/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy.html#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henrikfalck.com/blog2/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy-dumbass.html#comment-876</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll be happy to know that 匁 is being removed from the latest 常用漢字 list.  :-)

Hmm, am I weird for easily recognizing everything in 国立造幣局 except 造?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll be happy to know that 匁 is being removed from the latest 常用漢字 list.  <img src='http://henrikfalck.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hmm, am I weird for easily recognizing everything in 国立造幣局 except 造?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://henrikfalck.com/blog/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy.html#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henrikfalck.com/blog2/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy-dumbass.html#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Heh, I had to look up 匁 in my kanji dictionary to remember what it meant. What&#039;s amusing is that its definition - old unit of weight - includes its equivalent in DRAMS. Which is an equally obscure word in English. I mean, the only people who would really need to measure 1/16 of an ounce (dram) would probably be using metric anyway. For the sake of completion, 匁 is equal to 2.117 drams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, I had to look up 匁 in my kanji dictionary to remember what it meant. What&#8217;s amusing is that its definition &#8211; old unit of weight &#8211; includes its equivalent in DRAMS. Which is an equally obscure word in English. I mean, the only people who would really need to measure 1/16 of an ounce (dram) would probably be using metric anyway. For the sake of completion, 匁 is equal to 2.117 drams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://henrikfalck.com/blog/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy.html#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henrikfalck.com/blog2/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy-dumbass.html#comment-670</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really understand the pointof this. So we&#039;re saying that a small percentage of the kanji we don&#039;t need to know. But we&#039;re not allowed to tell ourselves this in case they crop up somewhere?  Er, pass the frequency table ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t really understand the pointof this. So we&#39;re saying that a small percentage of the kanji we don&#39;t need to know. But we&#39;re not allowed to tell ourselves this in case they crop up somewhere?  Er, pass the frequency table &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://henrikfalck.com/blog/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy.html#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henrikfalck.com/blog2/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy-dumbass.html#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough in the questionnaires a lot of people can&#039;t read jouyou kanji in isolation but can read a lot in the context of words.  There are about 20 jouyou kanji that most Japanese can&#039;t read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough in the questionnaires a lot of people can&#39;t read jouyou kanji in isolation but can read a lot in the context of words.  There are about 20 jouyou kanji that most Japanese can&#39;t read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Henrik Falck</title>
		<link>http://henrikfalck.com/blog/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy.html#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Henrik Falck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henrikfalck.com/blog2/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy-dumbass.html#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Anonymous,&lt;br /&gt;I think being literate in Japanese means being able to at least read common fiction and non-fiction books and newspapers, and for that you need to be able to read words written using &quot;all&quot; (all minus a handful of useless ones) joujou kanji (plus some more). I guess you could argue what constitutes &quot;knowing&quot; a kanji, and that literacy is quantifiable and not absolute, but basically yes, I think that not being able to read all the jouyou kanji constitutes illiteracy in Japanese. I don&#039;t think you need to know the stroke orders. I&#039;d love to read your dissertation... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous,<br />I think being literate in Japanese means being able to at least read common fiction and non-fiction books and newspapers, and for that you need to be able to read words written using &quot;all&quot; (all minus a handful of useless ones) joujou kanji (plus some more). I guess you could argue what constitutes &quot;knowing&quot; a kanji, and that literacy is quantifiable and not absolute, but basically yes, I think that not being able to read all the jouyou kanji constitutes illiteracy in Japanese. I don&#39;t think you need to know the stroke orders. I&#39;d love to read your dissertation&#8230; <img src='http://henrikfalck.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://henrikfalck.com/blog/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy.html#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henrikfalck.com/blog2/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy-dumbass.html#comment-593</guid>
		<description>I am writing my dissertation on Japanese litearcy.  Do you relly think not knowing all the jouyou kanji constitutes illiteracy?  I don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am writing my dissertation on Japanese litearcy.  Do you relly think not knowing all the jouyou kanji constitutes illiteracy?  I don&#39;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://henrikfalck.com/blog/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy.html#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://henrikfalck.com/blog2/2008/08/learning-kanji-its-called-literacy-dumbass.html#comment-573</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t agree more, these folks are not worth debating. If you actually are learning so slowly or unintensively that knowing which &quot;20 to 50&quot; kanji on the list are &quot;not necessary&quot; is invaluable information to you, you&#039;re never going to get anywhere near literate IN YOUR LIFETIME anyway so just forget it and find a new hobby. I say: don&#039;t like having this little list as an invaluable kick start of stuff to learn ASAP, ? Okay fine. Shut up about it and go pick a random assortment of 2,000 out of a 60,000 kanji dictionary and tell me how spotty your coverage of a newspaper is when you are done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#39;t agree more, these folks are not worth debating. If you actually are learning so slowly or unintensively that knowing which &quot;20 to 50&quot; kanji on the list are &quot;not necessary&quot; is invaluable information to you, you&#39;re never going to get anywhere near literate IN YOUR LIFETIME anyway so just forget it and find a new hobby. I say: don&#39;t like having this little list as an invaluable kick start of stuff to learn ASAP, ? Okay fine. Shut up about it and go pick a random assortment of 2,000 out of a 60,000 kanji dictionary and tell me how spotty your coverage of a newspaper is when you are done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

